As promised, this week we are going to take a look at the unifying structures in the later iterations of The Sheffield Daily Telegraph supplement (which is called The Sheffield Weekly Telegraph and then just The Weekly Telegraph). I took extra time to put together this post, because I needed to prepare some supplementary materials for your entertainment and edification. Thank you for waiting patiently.
In The Nineteenth-Century Press in the Digital Age, James Mussell argues that to fully appreciate and understand the material produced by the nineteenth-century press (and how that material interacted with and informed 19C culture), “we now need to cultivate two sets of skills…familiarity with the forms and genres of the periodical and newspaper press; and the ability to interrogate the resources that present them in digital form.” He goes on to argue that two of the most important characteristics of nineteenth-century periodicals and newspapers are miscellaneity and seriality or random/unique elements that appear once or twice and then disappear and serial elements that stay the same over time. Noting that the use-value of these print texts “imposed contradictory conditions of stability and fluidity upon periodical form: each ‘number is different, but it is the same periodical,'” Mussell argues that “both miscellaneity and seriality might be predicated on difference – this article is different to the others on the page; this issue is different to the last – but this difference is tempered in each case by various recurrent features.” And, he concludes, “it is these predominately formal aspects of the publication, running across and between issues, that permit it to assert its identity and establish its persistence over time…Repetition is a vital and overlooked component of periodical form. It operates both synchronically, within the issue, and diachronically, between them in order to posit unifying structures that can manage difference.”
Today, as you may have guessed, we’ll be taking a look at these unifying structures as they exist in Saturday supplement of The Sheffield Daily Telegraph in 1879-1880.
This week in the Print Culture blog series, we’re taking a brief look at newspaper mastheads and how they change over time.
To do so, we’ll look at Saturday supplements of The Sheffield Daily Telegraph from the early years of publication, and then take a look at what’s changed or stayed the same every five-ish years after that until around 1894. As I noted in my last post, this blog series is possible because of The British Newspaper Archive, which is an amazing resource for periodicals and print culture scholars.
According to my research (via The British Newspaper archive), The Sheffield Daily Telegraph ran from 1855-1950 under varied ownership. It was originally published by “bookseller, printer and patent medicine dealer, Joseph Pearce” and “sold…to Frederick Clifford and William Leng” in 1864 (source). Pearce’s third credential is part of the reason for my interest in this particular newspaper, as my dissertation looks at the intersections of print culture and embodiment from a variety of perspectives (including medical humanities).
One of the most important traits I’ve worked to develop in graduate school is plasticity. Schedules change every term; life throws random things at you at the most inopportune times; working with students, faculty, and colleagues is invigorating and challenging in all the best ways, but also creates unanticipated challenges and dilemmas; administrators inform you that there are a handful of degree progress requirements nobody told you about; scholarship, conference, and professionalization opportunities present themselves and you have to drop everything to get your applications in on time.
Plasticity. Critical to making it through this crazy obstacle course.
First of all, my apologies for the late post. I thought I’d saved a draft but it had not in fact saved.
This week, we’re taking a peek at Frances Hodgson Burnett’s The Shuttle, which the internet tells me was published in 1907 but which the copyright notices in this edition sort of contradict.
Sometimes, a book catches your eye over and over again until you finally give in and bring it home EVEN THOUGH it isn’t quite the kind of thing you normally work with.
Harold MacGrath’s Arms and the Woman: A Romance (1899) is one of those books. The cover and title kept catching my eye. So I caved, and now I’m blogging about it.
Hello fellow book history enthusiasts! This week we return to the blog format.
Tonight, we’re taking a look at an edition of Ouida’s Bimbi: Stories for Children published by J.P. Lippincott & Co. of Philadelphia in 1882.
Last week, I spent a lot of time experimenting with a new way (for me) to discuss book history: the vlog. It’s been a lot of trail and error, and I don’t know if I’ll stick with this format, but I tried it–and it’s coherent.
You can find my video discussion of Matthew Arnold’s Poetical Works here. Below, I’ve posted supplemental material: pictures of the illustrations, the frontispiece, and the title page.